Years of austerity beckon for the next election’s unlucky winner
Jeremy Hunt’s tax giveaway comes at the price of our crumbling public services, as Sean O’Grady explains
There’s a belief that the worst Budgets are those that get a great reception on the day, only for the horrible underlying truths to emerge thereafter. This certainly seems to have been the case with Jeremy Hunt’s autumn statement, when the initial euphoria about tax cuts was supplanted by a realisation that the tax burden is actually still set to rise – and for years to come.
So how did Hunt pay for the “tax cuts that never were”?
One obvious answer is through future stealth taxes imposed on working people for many years. The freeze in tax thresholds that began in 2021 is scheduled to continue until 2028, yielding something like £100bn in extra tax revenues. By contrast, the chancellor has “given back” a mere £20bn – very welcome but not so munificent when set in context.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies